The Best TeamViewer Alternatives for Windows in 2026

What Is TeamViewer?

Remote support tools create encrypted sessions so technicians can view or control endpoints over the internet. They handle identity, authorization, and consent prompts, then broker traffic through relays or direct peer-to-peer paths. The goal is simple: resolve issues quickly without exposing internal networks or weakening policy.

Two core modes exist: attended access when a user is present and unattended access for service-mode devices. Technicians elevate privileges, pass UAC prompts, and switch users to finish privileged tasks. File transfer, clipboard sync, and multi-monitor selection keep workflows fast and predictable.

Business deployments extend the stack with granular roles, MFA, and auditable logs. They add device groups, approval flows, and least-privilege policies to reduce risk. Session recording, chat transcripts, and action histories help meet support SLAs and compliance obligations.

Modern tools also provide browser clients to avoid heavy agent rollouts. HTTPS gateways remove the need for VPNs and simplify external access. APIs and webhooks connect sessions to ticketing, inventory, or automation pipelines for better governance.

Why Would You Need an Alternative to TeamViewer?

Teams often hit pain points with licensing predictability, edition gating, or device limits. Costs can climb as fleets, technicians, or compliance features expand. Procurement wants predictable spend, not variable add-ons tied to usage spikes.

Security and governance requirements may exceed default controls. Many organizations need MFA, SSO, IP allowlists, and detailed audit trails. They also prefer hardened HTTPS gateways and clean isolation for external contractors or MSP tenants.

Operations leaders care about footprint, performance, and rollout speed. A lighter agent, fewer prompts, and faster upgrades reduce ticket volume. Browser options minimize endpoint overhead and improve time to first session for ad-hoc support.

Use-case fit is another driver for change. Some teams need app-centric workflows rather than broad remote control . Others want reversible deployment, clearer roles, or simpler policy models that new staff can operate confidently.

What To Look for in This Type of Alternative?

Start with security and identity, then validate day-two operations. Require MFA or SSO, role-based permissions, audit logs, and IP/geo rules. Confirm that gateways terminate TLS correctly and that policies stay readable for admins.

Evaluate core support workflows under real network conditions. Test attended and unattended sessions, elevation, UAC handling, and multi-monitor selection. Move files both ways and verify clipboard behavior, session recording, and privacy prompts.

Assess manageability and rollout friction. Look for silent installs, automatic updates, and device grouping with clear scopes. Ensure technicians can find devices fast and start sessions with minimal clicks.

Check interoperability and automation paths. APIs and webhooks should attach session data to tickets and assets. Native connectors for PSA, RMM , or chat speed up triage and closure.

Scrutinize licensing and total cost. Prefer transparent tiers with either perpetual or subscription options that map to growth. Model costs against technician seats, unattended endpoints, and compliance features you will actually use.

Run a structured pilot before committing. Define success metrics like time to first session, transfer speeds, and resolution rates. Include rollback steps, a training checklist, and a short runbook so the pilot converts smoothly to production.

The Best 8 TeamViewer Alternatives for Windows

TSplus Remote Support

TSplus Remote Support, The Practical TeamViewer Alternative for SMB Helpdesks

TSplus streamlines remote assistance with unattended access, role-based permissions, and browser options for internal and external users. Admins value fast setup, clear policies, and predictable costs that scale with needs, even in distributed, mixed-policy environments. Optional security add-ons reinforce MFA, IP/geo rules, and session governance for peace of mind, especially for audited, multi-tenant helpdesks.

Pros

• Straightforward install and admin that keep Windows device support predictable.
• Unattended and attended access with file transfer and multi-monitor viewing.
• Perpetual or subscription licensing to align spend with budget preferences.
• Browser options reduce client management and speed external access.
• Purposeful feature set that avoids heavyweight, high-cost suites.

Cons

• Edition feature depth varies, so upfront tier selection matters.
• Windows-centric focus prioritizes Windows support workflows.
• As with any remote tool, hardening and patch hygiene remain essential.
• Deep enterprise reporting may require complementary tools.

Pricing

• Perpetual and subscription plans tailored to SMBs with optional security add-ons.
• Transparent tiers scale economically as device counts and requirements grow.

Reviews/Ratings

• Customers highlight simplicity, stability, and quick deployments.
• Ratings are strong for ease of use and browser access.
• Value versus large suites is often cited for helpdesk operations.

AnyDesk

AnyDesk, The Fast Remote-Control Alternative

AnyDesk emphasizes low-latency sessions and a clean operator experience, even on high-latency or variable WAN links. It suits support teams that prioritize responsiveness and cross-platform reach across Windows, macOS, and mobile fleets. Governance features vary by edition, so validate policy depth, escalation controls, and logging expectations during trials.

Pros

• Responsive sessions and smooth cursor control for user satisfaction.
• Lightweight footprint and quick start for distributed teams.
• Broad device coverage for mixed environments.

Cons

• Advanced admin features can sit behind higher tiers.
• License models may add cost as fleets expand.
• Reporting depth varies by edition.

Pricing

• Tiered subscriptions by feature and seat scope.
• Costs rise with concurrent usage and advanced options.

Reviews/Ratings

• Praised for speed and responsive feel by many users.
• Feedback notes tier gating for enterprise features.
• Good satisfaction for core remote control scenarios.

Splashtop

Splashtop, The All-Rounder Solution for SMB Remote Support

Splashtop offers a balanced feature set with strong unattended access and device grouping, plus granular permissions for device groups. Admins appreciate the straightforward console and affordable entry points, alongside predictable scaling for growing teams. Security and compliance features should be validated against policy expectations, including MFA options, IP restrictions, and audit exports.

Pros

• Solid unattended access and reliable file transfer capabilities.
• Clear device organization and streamlined technician workflows.
• Competitive pricing structures designed for SMBs.

Cons

• Some enterprise controls require higher plans to enable.
• Browser flexibility varies depending on the scenario.
• Integration breadth differs across product editions.

Pricing

• Subscription tiers for individuals, teams, and businesses.
• Add-ons and plan choices affect total cost at scale.

Reviews/Ratings

• Consistently strong for usability and value in reviews.
• Positive notes on stability and device management features.
• Watch plan boundaries for specific security controls.

RemotePC

RemotePC, The Budget-Friendly Remote Access Option

RemotePC delivers inexpensive remote control with broad OS support and quick start, and easy invite flows for end users. It fits small teams that need basics plus reliable unattended access, plus straightforward policy templates for technicians. Admin depth and audit requirements should be evaluated during pilots, including log retention and basic SSO readiness.

Pros

• Low entry cost with generous device allowances for small fleets.
• Easy setup and straightforward administrative console.
• Strong fit for cost-conscious teams seeking essential features.

Cons

• Advanced governance and RBAC can be limited for compliance.
• Reporting and integrations vary by the chosen plan.
• Support SLAs and response times differ between tiers.

Pricing

• Subscription with multiple plan sizes and device scopes.
• Attractive per-device economics for budget-sensitive teams.

Reviews/Ratings

• Users like affordability and quick onboarding experience.
• Feedback often cites policy limitations at higher maturity.
• Good for straightforward remote access needs overall.

GoTo (LogMeIn/GoTo Resolve)

GoTo, The Mature Suite for Support Centers

GoTo combines remote control with ticketing and workflow tools in one platform, spanning chat and background management actions. It benefits teams that want an integrated support stack with broader capabilities and standardized escalations across distributed teams. Complexity and cost can increase with scope, compliance, and integrations, so forecast spend and governance early.

Pros

• Integrated toolset for service desks and centralized support teams.
• Mature ecosystem and strong partner reach across industries.
• Broad device coverage and stable performance under load.

Cons

• Premium pricing for advanced capabilities at enterprise scale.
• Suite complexity requires disciplined administration and training.
• Feature overlap may introduce sprawl without standards.

Pricing

• Subscription bundles by feature set and agent count.
• Add-ons and suite choices significantly influence TCO.

Reviews/Ratings

• Respected for breadth and reliability in demanding environments.
• Users note cost and configuration complexity over time.
• Strong for centralized support operations with governance.

VNC Connect (RealVNC)

VNC Connect, The Classic Protocol-Driven Alternative

VNC Connect offers lightweight remote viewing and control built on the VNC heritage, with minimal overhead for legacy systems. It suits controlled environments and embedded use cases very well, including labs and embedded hardware. Encryption, identity, and internet gateway scenarios should be validated carefully, and confirm encryption ciphers meet corporate standards.

Pros

• Minimal footprint and simple agenting for managed devices.
• Works well for LAN and embedded systems support.
• Predictable operation with basic remote access requirements.

Cons

• Governance and identity depth can be limited for enterprises.
• Internet traversal may require additional components or relays.
• Feature set is lean compared to modern support suites.

Pricing

• Subscription by device or team size and chosen capabilities.
• Features can be added as organizational needs evolve.

Reviews/Ratings

• Praised for simplicity and stability in targeted use cases.
• Feedback notes limited enterprise controls and audit depth.
• Great for basic, reliable access in controlled networks.

Microsoft Remote Desktop

Microsoft Remote Desktop, The Native Windows Option

Microsoft’s RDP stack enables remote access with familiar first-party clients across Windows estates, with policy-controlled, hardened connections. It is best for managed environments with established policies and governance, with helpdesk workflows layered via Group Policy. Gateways, certificates, and hardening raise administrative requirements for consistent uptime, so plan certificate rotation and monitoring accordingly.

Pros

• Native Windows integration and familiar client experience for users.
• Strong policy alignment with AD and Group Policy frameworks.
• No extra agent required for core remote access scenarios.

Cons

• Requires gateway hardening and certificate lifecycle management work.
• Limited helpdesk-style tooling out of the box for technicians.
• Browser-only access needs an HTML5 gateway component deployed.

Pricing

• Included components, but infrastructure and CALs may still apply.
• Operational overhead influences total cost beyond licensing.

Reviews/Ratings

• Reliable within Windows-managed estates of many sizes.
• Feedback highlights administrative complexity and upkeep.
• Best with disciplined configuration and standard operating procedures.

Chrome Remote Desktop

Chrome Remote Desktop, The Free Option for Occasional Use

CRD is fast to start and ideal for low-risk, personal scenarios and quick fixes from a modern browser with minimal setup. Business governance, auditing, and role-based control are limited by design choices, which limits adoption in stricter governance models. Treat it as a convenience tool rather than a primary business platform for production support or sensitive data.

Pros

• Zero license cost and simple browser-based workflow.
• Minimal setup steps and quick time to first session.
• Good for ad-hoc assistance on non-critical devices.

Cons

• Minimal policy, auditing, and RBAC for organizations.
• No enterprise-grade reporting or SLA commitments provided.
• Unsuitable for regulated data and compliance requirements.

Pricing

• Free with a Google account for individual usage.
• No enterprise SLAs or advanced administrative features.

Reviews/Ratings

• Users value speed and simplicity above all.
• Consistent notes on policy limitations and governance.
• Best for narrowly scoped access and occasional use.

How Do These Solutions Compare?

Solution	Best For	Deployment	Licensing	Notable strengths	Watch-outs	Reviews/Ratings
TSplus Remote Support	SMBs needing governed remote support	On-prem or cloud	Perpetual ; subscription	Unattended access, browser options, predictable costs	Edition features vary; Windows-centric	Praised for ease of use and rollout speed
AnyDesk	Low-latency remote control	Cloud + on-prem options	Subscription tiers	Fast sessions, light footprint	Enterprise features behind higher tiers	Strong UX; tier gating noted
Splashtop	SMB support teams	Cloud managed	Subscription tiers	Solid unattended access, device grouping	Advanced controls on higher plans	Good value and stability
RemotePC	Budget-conscious small teams	Cloud managed	Subscription	Low entry cost, easy onboarding	Limited RBAC and reporting depth	Positive on affordability
GoTo (LogMeIn/GoTo Resolve)	Service desks needing a suite	Cloud	Subscription bundles	Integrated workflows, mature ecosystem	Premium pricing; suite complexity	Respected breadth; config effort noted
VNC Connect	Controlled LAN/embedded use	On-prem or cloud relay	Subscription	Minimal footprint, stable basics	Limited enterprise governance	Praised for simplicity
Microsoft Remote Desktop	Windows-managed estates	On-prem + gateway	Included components	Native Windows alignment	Gateway hardening, admin complexity	Reliable but admin heavy
Chrome Remote Desktop	Personal/occasional access	Browser-based	Free	Zero cost, quick start	Minimal controls and auditing	Useful but basic

Conclusion

Choosing a TeamViewer alternative depends on goals like unattended support, governed access, or quick ad-hoc control. TSplus focuses on simple, secure remote support with strong SMB value and predictable operations. Shortlist two options, run a pilot, and validate security, performance, operator workflow, and total cost end-to-end before rollout.

Commonly Asked Questions

What is the best TeamViewer alternative for Windows SMBs?

TSplus Remote Support is a strong fit for SMB helpdesks that want simple setup, unattended access, and predictable pricing. The feature set stays focused on practical support tasks without the overhead of complex enterprise suites or heavy client management requirements.

Do these alternatives support unattended access and multi-monitor?

Most tools here support unattended access for governed sessions and multi-monitor viewing for technician efficiency. Always verify service-mode permissions, credential handling, and display selection during trials to ensure policy alignment and operator comfort under real network conditions.

Which options include browser-based (HTML5) access for users or technicians?

Several platforms provide browser options that avoid heavy client deployment and simplify external access. TSplus offers browser workflows through a lightweight gateway approach, while others vary by plan, so test clipboard, file transfer, and printing alongside identity and session policies.

How do licensing and TCO compare to TeamViewer’s model?

Alternatives offer a mix of perpetual and subscription models with edition-based features and agent scopes. Total cost depends on seat counts, unattended endpoints, and compliance add-ons, so map features to your exact workflows and measure costs against real ticket volumes.

Is Chrome Remote Desktop suitable for business use on Windows?

Chrome Remote Desktop is fine for personal or occasional access on non-critical systems, but it lacks auditing and granular policy controls. Most organizations require role-based access, logging, and SLAs, so treat CRD as a convenience tool rather than a primary platform.

What features matter most for secure remote support on Windows?

Prioritize MFA, IP/geo rules, hardened HTTPS gateways, and clear audit trails for every session. Add role-based permissions, service-mode controls, and reliable file transfer, then confirm patch cadence and alerting workflows to maintain a strong security baseline in production.

How should we pilot and migrate from TeamViewer?

Select one priority workflow, define success metrics, and include typical WAN conditions in tests. Validate unattended access, multi-monitor, file transfer, and MFA end-to-end, then measure ticket resolution, stability, and operator confidence before planning phased device migration.